We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem 5 of the monthly demo scenario has three models A, B, and C.
Model C is extracted from this paper: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012263
Its configuration (Table 1) requires one of the parameters \epsilon^{DC} to be a logit-normal distribution (with \mu = -1.46 and \sigma = 0.71).
\epsilon^{DC}
\mu = -1.46
\sigma = 0.71
Logit-normal distributions are supported by MIRA (present in its probonto.py) but it's missing from PyCIEMSS: https://github.com/ciemss/pyciemss/blob/main/pyciemss/mira_integration/distributions.py
probonto.py
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@liunelson , do you have an example AMR we can use as a test case for this?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Problem 5 of the monthly demo scenario has three models A, B, and C.
Model C is extracted from this paper:
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012263
Its configuration (Table 1) requires one of the parameters
\epsilon^{DC}
to be a logit-normal distribution (with\mu = -1.46
and\sigma = 0.71
).Logit-normal distributions are supported by MIRA (present in its
probonto.py
) but it's missing from PyCIEMSS:https://github.com/ciemss/pyciemss/blob/main/pyciemss/mira_integration/distributions.py
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: