Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correction: Swinburne Harvard should ignore publisher field in journal citations #7110

Open
wale opened this issue Jul 6, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #7118
Open

Correction: Swinburne Harvard should ignore publisher field in journal citations #7110

wale opened this issue Jul 6, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #7118

Comments

@wale
Copy link

wale commented Jul 6, 2024

As it stands, the CSL file for Swinburne Harvard sets the publisher macro regardless of citation type:

<macro name="publisher">
<group delimiter=", ">
<text variable="publisher"/>
<text variable="publisher-place"/>
</group>
</macro>

This is in opposition to the specification, where books need to have the publisher detailed in the citation, but not journals, newspaper articles or magazines.

Current example:

Campbell, JL & Pedersen, OK 2007, ‘The Varieties of Capitalism and Hybrid Success: Denmark in the Global Economy’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 40, no. 3, SAGE Publications Inc, pp. 307–332.

What it should contain:

Campbell, JL & Pedersen, OK 2007, ‘The Varieties of Capitalism and Hybrid Success: Denmark in the Global Economy’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 307–332.

@POBrien333
Copy link
Contributor

As you are already pointing out the issue and its solution, is there a specific reason why you're not making a PR?

@wale
Copy link
Author

wale commented Jul 8, 2024

I will be making a PR later on, I apologise that I haven't done so already

@wale wale linked a pull request Jul 11, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants