You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
one of our users discovered an issue with the AMA style: for conference proceedings references with some combination of fields completed, it will generate a weird . ; sequence that is not correct.
They should, I agree. But shouldn't the style itself accommodate scenarios where this field is missing? For instance IEEE generates this line without a publisher:
R. C. Carter, E. Harvey, and V. Casey, “User financing of rural handpump water services,”
in IRC Symposium: Pumps, Pipes and Promises, 2010.
And this with a publisher:
R. C. Carter, E. Harvey, and V. Casey, “User financing of rural handpump water services,”
in IRC Symposium: Pumps, Pipes and Promises, WaterAid, 2010.
(line breaks are from me to avoid horizontal scroll)
As you can see, there aren't 2 commas or something just because the publisher field is missing, so in the case of AMA it looks maybe like a style definition bug, or maybe an issue with the style itself?
Hello,
one of our users discovered an issue with the AMA style: for conference proceedings references with some combination of fields completed, it will generate a weird
. ;
sequence that is not correct.Steps to reproduce:
Edit
on the AMA style (either search or scroll to it)Example citations
in the top right cornerCitation 3
Advanced
, and paste this reference in json format:Expected output:
Carter RC, Harvey E, Casey V. User financing of rural handpump water services. In: IRC Symposium: Pumps, Pipes and Promises; 2010.
Actual output:
Carter RC, Harvey E, Casey V. User financing of rural handpump water services. In: IRC Symposium: Pumps, Pipes and Promises. ; 2010.
As you can see, there's an extra dot and space after the
container-title
field, which should not be there.Thank you for your time!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: