%claimchunk_am_trusted% does not work

[timmyb4]

Versions
Spigot Version: 1.20.6
ClaimChunk Version: 0.0.25-fix1

Describe the bug
plahoderapi tag %claimchunk_am_trusted% does not work.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. update placeholder api and chunckclaim
2. start server

Expected behavior
%claimchunk_am_trusted% must game trusted or not trusted text.

additional issues
[ClaimChunk] An update for ClaimChunk is available! Your version: 0.0.25-FIX1 | Latest version: 0.0.25

[cjburkey01]

Ah crap I knew that'd come back to bite us, thank you for the report!

We disabled that in 0.0.24 to allow the new access flags to work, but we can do a dirty fix if you'd like (maybe just lists which permissions players have access to in a given chunk?)

So instead of saying yes or no, it would be like "break, place, interactEntities" etc.

Would that work for your use case?

Also renaming it might be in order, like to %claimchunk_am_trusted_with% instead

Also my dang version checker system didn't account for post-release tags like FIX1...dang it

[timmyb4]

I use it to display the claim so you can see of you can do something on someone chunk

[cjburkey01]

Hm, maybe on top of the new permissions system, a /chunk trust command would just give people the same kind of access older versions used, then the placeholder would work. For now I guess, are you able to just remove that placeholder there until I get a solution?

[timmyb4]

you can try do it with access that you are trusted with all permissions.
and with a few or one partially trusted.
and with no permissions not trusted.

[cjburkey01]

Ok, so FIX2 that I just released re-adds the placeholder and just behaves the same, but shows a player is trusted if they have any permissions granted for a given chunk, would you be alright waiting a few days for 0.0.26 so I can get a nicer solution (like the one you suggested, maybe a specific "not owned" value as well so it doesn't show "not trusted" in unclaimed chunks (it used to do that, right?))

[timmyb4]

That is no problem thanks.
Maybe you can also add by ur own chunk it says owned.