-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Library to communicate with the SVSM and attest the VTPM from the guest #361
Comments
Hi @ShannonSD Yes, I believe you are looking for the Attestation protocol defined in the SVSM specification (chapter 7). I implemented this protocol some time ago, I can rebase it to latest and submit. The SVSM spec, section 8.3.3, defines that the vTPM EK is returned to the SVSM_ATTEST_SINGLE_SERVICE caller, but not the vTPM SK. The Linux patch series below will be required, specially the patch 14. Currently, it is under review. Claudio |
Sorry, I wanted to share with you a link to our COCONUT/linux repository, but I ended picking up the upstream. |
This issue is stale. Okay to close? |
Hi @cclaudio I am interested in using TSM to obtain the vTPM's EK. Would it possible to rebase what you have implemented and commit? Geoffrey |
Hi @IT302 |
Hi @cclaudio is there an update on this? |
Is there currently an interface for a guest to communicate with the SVSM to request a VMPL0 attestation report that attests and binds the vTPM to the guest (perhaps by inclduing the vTPM's EK and SK)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: