Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tag roadways in San José with sidewalk=separate #41

Open
1ec5 opened this issue Apr 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Tag roadways in San José with sidewalk=separate #41

1ec5 opened this issue Apr 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@1ec5
Copy link
Member

1ec5 commented Apr 29, 2023

After #6 imported sidewalk ways throughout San José, some pedestrian routers began returning suboptimal routes because they assume a roadway is walkable unless otherwise specified, even if a sidewalk way runs parallel to it: openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema#454 (comment). Since sidewalks are now mapped comprehensively in the city, we should blanket the city’s roadways with sidewalk=separate, which is designed to disable this assumption.

If there’s no sidewalk running along the street, sidewalk=no would be appropriate, but it also seems to be common to tag sidewalk=separate in these cases, leaving it to a router to discover that there is no such separate sidewalk.

I don’t think this needs to go through all the formalities of the mechanical edit guidelines. This would be essentially the last required step of the already approved sidewalk import, and it would be concentrated in a specific city, albeit a vast city. Nevertheless, I’m sure we’ll have plenty of opportunities to communicate this edit with the local community.

@1ec5 1ec5 added the import label Apr 29, 2023
@impiaaa
Copy link
Collaborator

impiaaa commented Apr 29, 2023

Here is a MapRoulette challenge I created to review all roads in San José with sidewalk=yes, sidewalk=left, sidewalk=right, or sidewalk=both.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants