You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, SPs are not slashed if they miss up to slashCriterion proofs. Once slashCriterion proofs are missed, the SP is slashed. The problem this creates is that there is no source of funds for validators that marked the proofs as missing when the SP was not slashed.
To simplify this situation, remove the leniency of allowing slashCriterion proofs to be missed before slashing occurs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From the statement, we discussed this, and we have decided to remove the leniency, so every missed proof will be slashed. I understand that the slashCriterion has to be removed.
Currently, SPs are not slashed if they miss up to
slashCriterion
proofs. OnceslashCriterion
proofs are missed, the SP is slashed. The problem this creates is that there is no source of funds for validators that marked the proofs as missing when the SP was not slashed.To simplify this situation, remove the leniency of allowing
slashCriterion
proofs to be missed before slashing occurs.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: