Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove missing proof leniency #195

Open
Tracked by #46
emizzle opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #210
Open
Tracked by #46

Remove missing proof leniency #195

emizzle opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #210
Assignees
Labels
Marketplace See https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNZ03E-c=/ for details

Comments

@emizzle
Copy link
Collaborator

emizzle commented Oct 17, 2024

Currently, SPs are not slashed if they miss up to slashCriterion proofs. Once slashCriterion proofs are missed, the SP is slashed. The problem this creates is that there is no source of funds for validators that marked the proofs as missing when the SP was not slashed.

To simplify this situation, remove the leniency of allowing slashCriterion proofs to be missed before slashing occurs.

@emizzle emizzle added the Marketplace See https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNZ03E-c=/ for details label Oct 17, 2024
@2-towns 2-towns self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
@2-towns
Copy link

2-towns commented Jan 14, 2025

Just for reference this thread on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/895609329053474826/1293537179481669703.

From the statement, we discussed this, and we have decided to remove the leniency, so every missed proof will be slashed. I understand that the slashCriterion has to be removed.

@2-towns 2-towns linked a pull request Jan 14, 2025 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Marketplace See https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNZ03E-c=/ for details
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants