Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Query Review Screen #65

Open
bdolly opened this issue Feb 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Query Review Screen #65

bdolly opened this issue Feb 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@bdolly
Copy link
Member

bdolly commented Feb 1, 2017

assigned to @w0lya

@dhimmel can you please provide some functional as well as layout requirements for this view, specifically those that pertain to the data visualization(s) needed?

@bdolly bdolly added the task label Feb 1, 2017
@bdolly bdolly self-assigned this Feb 1, 2017
@bdolly bdolly added this to the Minimum Viable Product milestone Feb 1, 2017
@bdolly
Copy link
Member Author

bdolly commented Feb 1, 2017

@dhimmel the more I think about the more I don't think this is a mission critical screen for the MVP and could be de-prioritized a bit, thoughts?

@dhimmel
Copy link
Member

dhimmel commented Feb 1, 2017

I don't think it's mission critical. I was thinking it would have the following elements:

  1. the list of selected genes and their corresponding number of positives and negatives
  2. the list of selected mutations and their corresponding number of positives and negatives
  3. the mutation frequency by disease type heatmap from Using Vega-Lite and Altair API to visualize the data machine-learning#74.
  4. In the future, there may also be some machine learning parameters that can be tweaked.

So 1 & 2 are already available on other parts of the workflow. 3 will be helpful, but it's not essential for MVP... so if this will hold us back, I'm okay with deferring this until later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants