Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should channels bleed into the execute command based on condarc? #30

Open
pelson opened this issue Aug 25, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Should channels bleed into the execute command based on condarc? #30

pelson opened this issue Aug 25, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@pelson
Copy link
Contributor

pelson commented Aug 25, 2016

It leaves an unpalatable irreproducibility about it, but is also somewhat convenient to avoid having to type defaults all the time.

One option: only include those from condarc if no channel directive is set in the execute heaader.

@ericdill
Copy link
Contributor

Is there any thought of simply delegating to conda-env and making the conda-execute header match the environment.yaml spec?

@pelson
Copy link
Contributor Author

pelson commented Aug 26, 2016

Is there any thought of simply delegating to conda-env and making the conda-execute header match the environment.yaml spec?

Yep. I'd be game for that. Obviously conda-env doesn't do all of it (e.g. run_with, installing into a managed temporary environment), but the bits it can do (particularly the env definition) I'm up for using it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants