-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing public OutputType
#270
Comments
Hi @swiftyfinch. Thanks for being an xcbeautify user, and sorry for the delayed response! I internalized OutputType, since I wanted this to be an implementation detail, similar to most of the other types. In the future, my intention has been to simply read a string and output an optional (formatted) string via Xcbeauitier. Recently, I introduced a protocol called OutputRendering. Its concrete types are meant to be custom formatters, and I think that might address your use case. Have you looked into this, and what do you think about creating one to solve this issue? I’d like to avoid re-exposing other types as public, since it’ll slow down some of the otherwise breaking changes I’ve been planning to make, but I’m open to other ideas. Let me know what you think, and we can find a way to continue supporting your use case. |
@cpisciotta I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you mean. If so, it would look like this: public protocol OutputRendering { ... }
public enum Renderer: String {
...
/// Any custom render
case custom(OutputRendering)
}
XCBeautifier(renderer: .custom(MyRender())).format(line: "something") And then, any user can provide a custom render. However, there is a downside - it requires opening a lot of public protocol ErrorCaptureGroup: CaptureGroup {
var wholeError: String { get }
}
struct MyRender: OutputRendering {
func formatError(group: ErrorCaptureGroup) -> String {
let errorMessage = group.wholeError
return ... // custom implementation
}
} Did I understand you correctly? |
@swiftyfinch Not quite. I am asking if you'd be open to implementing a "Rugby-style" formatter directly in the xcbeautify project. It would obviously be consumed by Rugby, but because it'd be in the project, it could be used by others too. |
@cpisciotta Oh, I see. |
@swiftyfinch No problem! Let me know how I can help. |
Hello @cpisciotta!
Firstly, I have been using xcbeautify for many years and I absolutely love it!
I noticed that you have restricted the visibility of
OutputType
frompublic
topackage
.swiftyfinch/Rugby#366
This was important for my project as it allowed me to:
error
/tests
typesCould we please open it again?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: