You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current behaviour
A second participant number estimation by the same user is counted as a new estimation and calculated into the average.
Expected behaviour
The second estimation should be considered as a correction of the first one.
e.g.: I estimated 50 and after counting the participants in a video I entered 62: Now the number, based on my estimation only, is 56.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I got many questions regarding participant estimation after the kidical mass last weekend. I guess there is a lot of work waiting for me as the estimation system is one of the oldest parts of the critical mass application.
At the moment, the system grabs all estimations assigned to a ride and calculates the average. This isn’t even kind of transparent, as it leads to rough estimates.
I would prefer to add a list to the ride overview page where all estimates are presented in a table and the community can pick the most accurate. Additionally, it should be possible to add a coordinate to the estimate to see where the bikes were counted.
Current behaviour
A second participant number estimation by the same user is counted as a new estimation and calculated into the average.
Expected behaviour
The second estimation should be considered as a correction of the first one.
e.g.: I estimated 50 and after counting the participants in a video I entered 62: Now the number, based on my estimation only, is 56.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: