You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That's a good point. Having the aggregate panel to help identify correlations probably makes sense for threads as well as allocations. Yeah, and having the cpu loads already normalized is convenient too.
I'm not sure whether Cryostat already has this feature, but having the ability to filter out allocation size below a specified threshold might help with noise in the aggregated chart. I imagine there's probably a lot of smaller allocations, but in most cases you care more about trends between object types that have large/sustained allocations. This could allow you to do some graph re-scaling as well, spacing out the "important" lines more, making them easier to differentiate.
I'm not sure whether Cryostat already has this feature, but having the ability to filter out allocation size below a specified threshold might help with noise in the aggregated chart. I imagine there's probably a lot of smaller allocations, but in most cases you care more about trends between object types that have large/sustained allocations. This could allow you to do some graph re-scaling as well, spacing out the "important" lines more, making them easier to differentiate.
Originally posted by @roberttoyonaga in cryostatio/cryostat#135 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: