Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] User configuration options to plug in their own S3 object storage provider #959

Open
andrewazores opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
feat New feature or request

Comments

@andrewazores
Copy link
Member

andrewazores commented Oct 7, 2024

See also #167 (comment)
Related to #814

We should expose CRD configuration fields to allow the user to specify their own S3 object storage parameters, so that the user can choose their own storage provider rather than be restricted to the cryostat-storage fork of SeaweedFS.

Not only might the user have some technical/regulatory requirements to not use cryostat-storage and host the storage themselves, but it's likely that any serious production deployment of Cryostat will have particular storage requirements in need of specific tuning, scaling, etc. to suit.

Some of the relevant configuration properties can be seen here: https://github.com/cryostatio/cryostat/blob/446f0d730e26eac1a2f83035e4f6845fcef7dfd1/compose/s3-seaweed.yml#L7

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feat New feature or request
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant