MIT license text missing

[djmdjm]

Quite a few of the files are listed as being dual-licensed under both the MIT and Apache 2.0 licenses, but the LICENSE file in the root of the repository only contains text for the Apache license. Would it be possible to include explicit MIT license text? Either in the LICENSE file as a separate section or in a separate file (say LICENSE.MIT) would be fine.

Context: we're considering using the ML-KEM implementation from libcrux in OpenSSH and we'd like to use avail ourselves of the option to use it under the MIT license.

[franziskuskiefer]

I add the MIT license file in #516.
Do you plan on using the Rust version or the C extraction?

[djmdjm]

Thanks for the fast response! We'd be interested in using the C extraction.

[franziskuskiefer]

👍🏻 There are currently two different versions in the tree.

• The c directory contains a full C version with all variants
• The cg directory contains 768 in a header only configuration

There is also a Neon implementation that is currently not extracted. I'd be happy to discuss help you extract other variants/combinations if needed.

[djmdjm]

Thanks! I sent you an email to discuss further because the issue tracker probably isn't the best place to talk...