Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

formulae & assumptions should not be hidden in the hints #286

Open
goyalyashpal opened this issue Oct 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

formulae & assumptions should not be hidden in the hints #286

goyalyashpal opened this issue Oct 20, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@goyalyashpal
Copy link

goyalyashpal commented Oct 20, 2024

hi again!

so i noticed that in the 2024 filter cs50 pset page:

  • the formulae used in the filters like grayscale, sepia; and algorithm for blur are hidden under hints
  • whereas, the formulae used is a crucial part of the problem
  • it feels really hindering to the [can't recall the proper adjective] students who really want to be able to solve as much part of the problem as possible by themselves without taking any additional aids or hints

also lost in the 2024 page w.r.t. 2023 hint page is the general advice regarding:

  • The values of a pixel’s rgbtRed, rgbtGreen, and rgbtBlue components are all integers, so be sure to round any floating-point numbers to the nearest integer when assigning them to a pixel value!

here's a side by side comparison (2024 vs 2023) of the page showing the moved part from general top level content in 2023 (right) to hidden under hint in 2024 (left).

image

@dmalan dmalan transferred this issue from cs50/lectures Oct 20, 2024
@goyalyashpal goyalyashpal changed the title [x/pset4 filter] formulae should not be hidden in the hints [x/pset4 filter] formulae & assumptions should not be hidden in the hints Nov 8, 2024
@goyalyashpal
Copy link
Author

goyalyashpal commented Nov 8, 2024

same goes for this part of x/pset2 readability.

  • the "assumptions" aren't really "hint" or even advice of any sort,
  • these are the absolute common denominator to solve the problem and against which the solution will be checked.

https://cs50.harvard.edu/x/2024/psets/2/readability/#advice

  • Definition of letter for the problem:

    Consider letters to be uppercase or lowercase alphabetical character, not punctuation, digits, or other symbols.

  • Definition of word:

For the purpose of this problem, we’ll consider any sequence of characters separated by a space to be a word (so a hyphenated word like “sister-in-law” should be considered one word, not three). You may assume that a sentence:

will contain at least one word;
will not start or end with a space; and
will not have multiple spaces in a row.

Under those assumptions, you might be able to find a relationship between the number words and the number of spaces. You are, of course, welcome to attempt a solution that will tolerate multiple spaces between words or indeed, no words!

  • Definition of a sentence:

    You can consider any sequence of characters that ends with a . or a ! or a ? to be a sentence.

@goyalyashpal goyalyashpal changed the title [x/pset4 filter] formulae & assumptions should not be hidden in the hints formulae & assumptions should not be hidden in the hints Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant