You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here's a snapshot of the current downstream distribution of gpredict in the package ecosystem:
Ignoring all obsolete and unique entries, notice that there is a mixture of 2.2.1, 2.3, 2.3.x
But we don't see any mention of 2.3 in Github, the release version shows v2.2.1. The NEWS file shows 2.2 (no mention of the minor version 2.2.1 or 2.3).
Would it be possible to bring more uniformity to this situation ? TIA!
2.2.1 is the latest stable release.
2.3-x are development snapshots from git, and because 2.2.1 is very old now, some distributions have started distributing these snapshots.
Here's a snapshot of the current downstream distribution of gpredict in the package ecosystem:
Ignoring all obsolete and unique entries, notice that there is a mixture of 2.2.1, 2.3, 2.3.x
But we don't see any mention of 2.3 in Github, the release version shows v2.2.1. The NEWS file shows 2.2 (no mention of the minor version 2.2.1 or 2.3).
Would it be possible to bring more uniformity to this situation ? TIA!
PS
JFYI, Sourceforge https://sourceforge.net/projects/gpredict/files/Gpredict/ shows:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: