You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The entire list of loose html (as per #17) with NJR assessment are in the attached spreadsheet (also in the GD with the same name) 2021-07-14_S3-content_index.xlsx
There are 3 columns:
File name and link
Notes - identification (if possible), description of contents
Action - with one of three values
a. Remove - don't need this page/file --> should be put into one folder together
b. Add to [Semester+year] -it has been identified and should be added to the listings in that semester and year --> this has been completed by Greg as part of assess loose html files in content/ in S3 #17
c. [blank] - need to determine what to do with this - see below
The majority of the [blank] action items are either student/staff profiles or teaching resources:
The teaching resources should probably be separated from the content/ directory as they are not fieldnotes proper, though they should be preserved (and reviewed separately by NJR and PHS)
The profiles: either need to be added to their semesters or removed. The staff profiles don't have a related semester, so they perhaps need to be put together or just removed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The entire list of loose html (as per #17) with NJR assessment are in the attached spreadsheet (also in the GD with the same name)
2021-07-14_S3-content_index.xlsx
There are 3 columns:
a. Remove - don't need this page/file --> should be put into one folder together
b. Add to [Semester+year] -it has been identified and should be added to the listings in that semester and year --> this has been completed by Greg as part of assess loose html files in content/ in S3 #17
c. [blank] - need to determine what to do with this - see below
The majority of the [blank] action items are either student/staff profiles or teaching resources:
content/
directory as they are not fieldnotes proper, though they should be preserved (and reviewed separately by NJR and PHS)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: