Proposal: Renaming Python package.

[BenMGeo]

based on the new naming convention(s), I suggest the following action for the python subpackage.

1. The sdk functionalities (measurement, acquisition context, etc) will be ported to the submodule cuvis.sdk
2. the classificator functionalities will be ported to the submodule cuvis.ai (as far as I understood)
3. the examples will be the ported to the main cuvis package as functionalities.

the package will have the following look for the user:

import cuvis provides examples to run the camera with.
import cuvis.sdk provides all sdk functionalities
import cuvis.ai provides the classificator (maybe we should divide the ai part into multiple submodules?)

[BenMGeo]

@arndcubert @robertCubert @nhanson2

any thoughts?

[robertCubert]

I think the renaming is a good idea, I would suggest to leave the examples with the SDK though. So only cuvis.sdk and cuvis.ai?

[BenMGeo]

That would mean import cuvis would be empty. Not the greatest fan ;)

[nhanson2]

As with all things Python, I would encourage us to follow the PEP8 standard unless we have a good reason to break with convention.

https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#package-and-module-names

[BenMGeo]

the naming suggestion above is within the PEP8 standard, as far as I know. I'm not sure about empty main package. I'll do some research.