You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In profiling mode, if provided with images of different sizes than the specified in the config (in config["dataset"]["images"][{"width", "height"}]), DP will silently generate incorrect crops.
I think the issue comes from get_cropping_regions(), where the config-specified image size is used to normalise the bounding indices. Note that there's no exception raised when the input image mismatches the specified shape.
I also think the docs are slightly confusing, as it's mentioned:
The size of images is, in principle, flexible and DeepProfiler can work with different resolutions and image dimensions.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this is the only reason making DeepProfiler incompatible with images of variable size (for profiling) and could easily be solved by reading the image dimensions dynamically. I opened a PR to implement just that - #354.
It'd be great if you could also update the docs to clarify how DeepProfiler handles images of variable size in training vs. profile mode.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @goncinious, thank you for the interest in our work and the PR!
The documentation part you mention:
The size of images is, in principle, flexible and DeepProfiler can work with different resolutions and image dimensions.
Meant that you can process different images, but I agree, it does not mention that a single pipeline should have fixed image size. We indeed need to clarify that.
I will return to you regarding the PR and fix documentation.
In profiling mode, if provided with images of different sizes than the specified in the config (in
config["dataset"]["images"][{"width", "height"}]
), DP will silently generate incorrect crops.I think the issue comes from
get_cropping_regions()
, where the config-specified image size is used to normalise the bounding indices. Note that there's no exception raised when the input image mismatches the specified shape.I also think the docs are slightly confusing, as it's mentioned:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this is the only reason making DeepProfiler incompatible with images of variable size (for profiling) and could easily be solved by reading the image dimensions dynamically. I opened a PR to implement just that - #354.
It'd be great if you could also update the docs to clarify how DeepProfiler handles images of variable size in training vs. profile mode.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: