Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the result #9

Open
dongZheX opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

About the result #9

dongZheX opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@dongZheX
Copy link

Hello, thanks for the code.
In the paper, you follow the evlataion strategy used in 《How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?》. In your code, I can't find how you calculate the final result.
Because I find several other papers that use the same split strategy but the method of computing final result is different.
so, could you please tell me that whether you follow the method:
"The cross-validation in our paper only uses training and validation sets (no test set) due to small dataset size. Specifically, after obtaining 10 validation curves corresponding to 10 folds, we first took average of validation curves across the 10 folds (thus, we obtain an averaged validation curve), and then selected a single epoch that achieved the maximum averaged validation accuracy. Finally, the standard devision over the 10 folds was computed at the selected epoch."
to calculate the result reported in your paper.

Looking forward to your reply.

Thanks

@xiaominUMD
Copy link

xiaominUMD commented Mar 4, 2022

Thanks for the code too! Your codes look decent.

I am also curious about the result. and as dongZheX mentioned "selected a single epoch that achieved the maximum averaged validation accuracy.", I think selecting best result from one epoch may give bias to the final result, as we are tuning the train process based on test data (future unseen data). But this is from 《How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?》. I am wondering if you are using the same strategy?

Thanks!

@dongZheX
Copy link
Author

dongZheX commented Mar 5, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants