You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Tools like Wagyu allow you to create a JSON file to be submitted to the beacon to implement the BLS to execution. Implement a "submit" to import this generated JSON file to the beacon in the Bran UI
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
User has full control, submits to their own beacon node
Cons:
More development, potentially duplicating work
Option 2
Pros:
Less work, less duplication, faster GTM
Cons:
Dependant of an external service.
Since we don't want people to create the message in Dappnode because it's an online machine, this means that they will have to go out to use an external service for the message creation anyway (Wagyu FTW). Hence it seems reasonable that we also link them to the beaconcha.in service for submitting the message.
On our side, we cover them by warning them that their withdrawal address is NOT 0x01 automatically and immediately offering a resolution path. For me that's the important part and it doesn't matter so much whether they submit to their beacon node or they submit in Beaconcha.in.
Tools like Wagyu allow you to create a JSON file to be submitted to the beacon to implement the BLS to execution. Implement a "submit" to import this generated JSON file to the beacon in the Bran UI
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: