You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
Do you have plans for allowing strict type-checking of tests using the default argument syntax? The issue I see here is that the parameter should be annotated with the type of the value injected into the test, but the default argument has the type of the fixture that provides the value. It seems analogous to how dataclasses.field works, and would probably require a mypy plugin as well?
Do you have plans for allowing strict type-checking of tests using the default argument syntax? The issue I see here is that the parameter should be annotated with the type of the value injected into the test, but the default argument has the type of the fixture that provides the value. It seems analogous to how dataclasses.field works, and would probably require a mypy plugin as well?
Originally posted by @cjolowicz in #268 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: