Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prepend default deck to all otherwise determined deck names #276

Open
jaker-dotcom opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

prepend default deck to all otherwise determined deck names #276

jaker-dotcom opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jaker-dotcom
Copy link

Describe the solution you'd like

  • currently you can select "logseq-deck" as default
  • specifying another deck will create a deck at the sibling-level, e.g.
    • namespaces e.g. study/rockets cards will create a new sibling deck called "study"
    • or specified via page/block property
  • I'd prefer having all of logseqs cards in a deck so I can study them all at once
  • thus I suggest option for prepending "logseq-deck" to all otherwise determined deck names
  • as a result study/rockets cards would end up in "logseq-deck::study" deck in anki

Describe how it will help your workflow
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

I don't think there is an alternative other than defining the deck property for each page in a namespace and typing out the default deck name for every occurrence of deck property (autosuggestion would be nice anyways).

It will help me declutter the anki home and also provide me with better learning, through interveaving / reducing context hints.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

When I realised that I had too many decks, I changed all existing deck: name to be deck: top/name. It works but it is a hassle.

I will look into using tags instead, but I try to use only few general tags in logseq (idea, problem etc) so I don't think I can be happy with that option either.

See #35 who also suggests that he'd prefer interleaved learning.

@jaker-dotcom jaker-dotcom added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 23, 2024
@debanjandhar12 debanjandhar12 self-assigned this Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants