Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DCO review #18

Open
dhh1128 opened this issue Jul 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

DCO review #18

dhh1128 opened this issue Jul 15, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@dhh1128
Copy link
Collaborator

dhh1128 commented Jul 15, 2020

The existing peer DID spec was built mostly with DCO enforced against its repo. At one point I went back and looked at commits and came to the conclusion that it had IP integrity. We also did a quick review of listed contributors, making sure that all of them were DIF members covered under DIF's contributor agreements. All of the big conceptual contributions come from DIF members for sure. See the issue history on openssi/peer-did-method-spec#82. However, it would be good to raise our level of confidence in this spec by doing 2 additional due diligence tasks:

  1. Make sure DCO is now enabled for this repo.
  2. Run a formal DCO check against the entire repo history to make sure we didn't miss anything in our informal checks.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants