feat: markdown formatting

[dalechyn]

Would be nice to see some formatted code as pr-codex sometimes references to the code functions objects etc

[jjranalli]

@h0tw4t3r makes sense. Could you link a comment to use as reference?

[dalechyn]

@jjranalli,

Tldr

Added cookie-parser to package.json, added AuthGuard to auth.controller, added AuthService to auth.guard.spec.ts.

Detailed summary

• Added "cookie-parser": "^1.4.6" to package.json
• Added AuthGuard to auth.controller.ts
• Added AuthService to auth.guard.spec.ts
• Imported CanActivate and AuthGuard to auth.controller.spec.ts
• Added a mockAuthGuard to auth.controller.spec.ts
• Modified getNonce() in auth.controller.ts to send response instead of returning string
• Modified auth() in auth.controller.ts to send true instead of empty response
• Added validate() and logout() methods to auth.controller.ts
• Implemented validate() method in auth.controller.ts to send true and set content type to text/plain
• Implemented logout() method in auth.controller.ts to send true and clear cookies
• Modified getNonce() in auth.controller.spec.ts to check response.send() is called with a string
• Modified auth() in auth.controller.spec.ts to check response.send() is called with true
• Implemented validate() method in auth.controller.spec.ts to check response.send() is called with true and content type is set to text/plain
• Implemented logout() method in auth.controller.spec.ts to check response.send() is called with true, content type is set to text/plain and cookies are cleared
• Imported Request and Response from express to auth.guard.spec.ts
• Modified canActivate() in auth.guard.ts to check if access token is valid and call canActivateViaRefreshToken() if it's not.
• Implemented canActivate() method in auth.guard.spec.ts to check if canActivateViaRefreshToken() is called when access token is invalid.

The following files were skipped due to too many changes: pnpm-lock.yaml.

[jjranalli]

To make sure I understand this, it appears that in most comments it uses backticks to format filenames (ie paradigmxyz/flux#63 (comment)). However in the comment shared above this doesn't seem to be happening. So is it not consistent?

[dalechyn]

To make sure I understand this, it appears that in most comments it uses backticks to format filenames (ie paradigmxyz/flux#63 (comment)). However in the comment shared above this doesn't seem to be happening. So is it not consistent?

Yeah, you're absolutely right, it is not consistent.

I don't really know, maybe we should lower the temperature and tell it a bit more forcefully to style code?

[jjranalli]

@h0tw4t3r Let's see if #7 works, and if that's not enough we can try lowering temp. If the comment shared above is in one of your repos, can you push a commit and see how does the new pr-codex comment look?

[jjranalli]

closing this for now, feel free to reopen if needed