Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chef Infra Client 16+ NoMethodError: undefined method `password_policy' #52

Open
idiudiuki opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Comments

@idiudiuki
Copy link

Cookbook version version '0.9.1'

It looks like this issue was fixed but the fix is not visible in the supermarket.
We still receive the following errors:
NoMethodError: undefined method `password_policy'
NoMethodError: undefined method `security_policy'

Please see the comments in the issue (#50):
"Looks like version '0.9.1' from supermarket.chef.io does not contain this fix since the version in #49 wasn`t bumped."

Related link: https://github.com/dev-sec/chef-windows-hardening/pull/49/files

Could you please take a look and fix this?

@IrynaAbikh
Copy link

Hi @tas50, we experience the same problem. Looks like version '0.9.1' from supermarket.chef.io does not contain this fix since the version in #49 wasn`t bumped.
Could you please fix it?

@fatbasstard
Copy link

Hi @tas50 ,

Same issue here. Is it possible to get a new release out?

@idiudiuki
Copy link
Author

This is still relevant for us. Can anyone please take a look?

@createchange
Copy link

createchange commented May 17, 2021

@tas50 Can you please take a look at this? I know you mentioned that you don't know who the maintainer is, but it'd be nice if the issue wasn't left to die. There are multiple people who are effected by this. As a new Chef user, the onboarding process has been less than ideal.

@IrynaAbikh
Copy link

This is still relevant for us. Can anyone please take a look?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants