Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
we do need to update https://eoapi.dev/customization/ for clarity! The eoapi project is split into multiple things:
https://github.com/developmentseed/eoAPI/tree/main/runtime/eoapi/raster is an example of how to customize titiler-pgstac and https://github.com/developmentseed/eoAPI/blob/main/infrastructure/aws/cdk/app.py#L137-L187 is the CDK code used for deployment Easier ways for customization will be provided with https://github.com/developmentseed/eoapi-template (at least if you are using eoapi-cdk) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey all!
I am a current user (and huge fan) of several of the base services included in
eoAPI
. I have built an app on top ofstac-fastapi-pgstac
and added custom functionality to a fork oftitiler-pgstac
to meet some of our specific business needs. The emergent features enabled by the interconnections between services ineoAPI
are compelling and I am interested in potentially adopting this stack, but it is unclear (to me, at least) what the best practices are for adding custom functionality to the base services. Or, iseoAPI
meant for organizations that just need an easy way to deploy this stack as-is?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions