Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove or adapt the devon4j kafka module #542

Open
baumeister25 opened this issue Apr 3, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Remove or adapt the devon4j kafka module #542

baumeister25 opened this issue Apr 3, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@baumeister25
Copy link

baumeister25 commented Apr 3, 2022

Depending on the issue #548 you can completely remove the module or need to adjust it to the leftover requirements

  • Keep only topics (if any) that are really bringing a benefit
  • Document the benefit for future projects
@hohwille
Copy link
Member

@baumeister25 I am happy with this step but we need to...

  • consistently rework documentation, etc.
  • provide a clear deprecation status
  • provide a (simple) "migration guide"
  • update sample app(s)

@hohwille
Copy link
Member

See also #470 - could you see what is actually left to do here?

@baumeister25
Copy link
Author

Thank you @hohwille ,
In zenhub it looks much better. This issue is a story of an epic which exactly explains and contains your points.
Somehow the connection to the epic is not that easily visible here. devonfw/.github#129
The complete epic is in progress by a student team at the moment

@hohwille
Copy link
Member

@baumeister25 thanks for the explanation. I still do not get why we need an epic and an issue addressing the same thing as the epic but I fully agree to the goal described in the epic: We should mark the kafka module as deprecated and change the documentation to propose using the spring[-boot] integration and give best-practices on this.

@maihacke are you involved here or can you create some connect so people who actually have experience with Kafka can contribute. If there is something I can tell from the start, it is that documentation like this can only be written by people who collected real-life project experience as otherwise we only waste time...

@maihacke
Copy link
Member

maihacke commented Jul 1, 2022

Hasn't this already be adressed with #470? What is missing? If you need connect to some Kafka experts, ping me via MS Teams.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants