Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Severe contradiction over the LBA dataset at 60% identity #54

Open
smiles724 opened this issue Apr 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Severe contradiction over the LBA dataset at 60% identity #54

smiles724 opened this issue Apr 15, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@smiles724
Copy link

Hi, dear atom3d,

I used successfully the LBA dataset with a 30% identity. However, there is a serious contradiction over the dataset with a 60% identity. To be explicit, as written in the paper, the split of 60% identity leads to training, validation, and test sets of sizes 3678, 460, and 460, respectively. However, there are only 3563 in the training while 452 samples in the test sets.

Can you please take a look at the splitting setting again and see whether there was a mistake?

Best,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant