You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When simulating a sample with 500nm Al as heatsink, I get a non zero transmission (1-4% transmission, depending on the sample architecture) of an IR excitation (1039nm) even though no IR should go through the Al. The multilayer absorption profile looks right though. If I add a very thin vacuum layer after the Al layer, then I always get a transmission of 0% which is expected.
Is it maybe possible to add an option, where an extra Vacuum layer is added to the stack?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When simulating a sample with 500nm Al as heatsink, I get a non zero transmission (1-4% transmission, depending on the sample architecture) of an IR excitation (1039nm) even though no IR should go through the Al. The multilayer absorption profile looks right though. If I add a very thin vacuum layer after the Al layer, then I always get a transmission of 0% which is expected.
Is it maybe possible to add an option, where an extra Vacuum layer is added to the stack?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: