We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
$ ls -lht ... lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2023-06-05 14:02 bin -> usr/bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2023-06-05 14:02 lib -> usr/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 2023-06-05 14:02 lib32 -> usr/lib32 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 2023-06-05 14:02 lib64 -> usr/lib64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2023-06-05 14:02 libx32 -> usr/libx32 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 2023-06-05 14:02 sbin -> usr/sbin
(with or without -L) gdu not display the location of symlinks. // seems -L, --follow-symlinks #202 not for dir symlinks
-L
-L, --follow-symlinks
Is this the expected effect
How about displaying them like ls -l does:
ls -l
bin -> usr/bin lib -> usr/lib lib32 -> usr/lib32 lib64 -> usr/lib64 libx32 -> usr/libx32 sbin -> usr/sbin
// just show link location (and allow navigate into it), not count it's size.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
(with or without
-L
) gdu not display the location of symlinks.// seems
-L, --follow-symlinks
#202 not for dir symlinksIs this the expected effect
How about displaying them like
ls -l
does:// just show link location (and allow navigate into it), not count it's size.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: