Open Meeting Agenda

[jzbmw]

This is the List of Topics to Discuss in the Open Meeting on Thursdays:

# YYYY-MM-DD

## Agenda Topics

| Status | Topic | Description |  IssueId / Links| Contributed by | Outcome|
| --- |---|----|---|---|---|
| OPEN| Have a look on the current Iteration | | https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-tractusx/projects/45/views/5 | | | 
| OPEN| | | | | 
| OPEN| | | | | 
| OPEN| | | | | 

## Open Discussions: 
- [  ] 

## Backlog : 
- [  ] 
- 
*Legend:* 
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-07-04

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ]

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-06-27

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
OPEN	Question regarding the IRS. There was an important bugfix provided for 24.05. eclipse-tractusx/item-relationship-service@cfc065c Is it possible to backport/cherry pick such a fix to version compatible to 24.03? Is there process to provide fixes to older versions and to create a new version tag? In our case we would need the fix for 4.5.X Summary of the issue: Submodel requests are not AAS compatible without the /$value suffix		@rogocof
OPEN
OPEN

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ] For the open point there will be an issue created including the information needed to create a hotfix release based on the required version of irs.

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-06-20

No participation of external contributors.

2024-06-13

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
DONE	Is there any reason to make the BPN/receiverBpn field required to create notification in 11.0.0 release?		#658 (comment)	@poojapatel23	BPN is bundled on frontend side and passes on bpn for multiple parts
DONE	I would like to ask you about the integration test cases for release 11.0.2. We are facing an issue where some integration tests fail when we run the mvn clean install command. However, these tests pass when run individually. Could you please confirm if you are experiencing the same issue with the 11.0.2 release?			@poojapatel23	Necessary to run mvn clean for models and backend to have a clear state before running the int tests - Reason is we use code generation creating classes based on schema
DONE	PR: feature : sorting by status according to the natural order #944	#944	#702	@poojapatel23	Requested for changes
DONE	Release 24.5 contributions	Release 24.5 contributions	https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-tractusx/projects/26/views/1?sliceBy%5Bvalue%5D=trace-x	@mkanal	Topics are closed as there is further contribution

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ]

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

# 2024-06-06

## Agenda Topics

| Status | Topic | Description |  IssueId / Links| Contributed by | Outcome|
| --- |---|----|---|---|---|
| WIP| PR:  feature : sorting by status according to the natural order #944  | https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/traceability-foss/pull/944 | https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/traceability-foss/issues/702 | @poojapatel23  | Will be reviewed in the next iteration | 
| WIP| Release 24.5 contributions | Release 24.5 contributions | https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-tractusx/projects/26/views/1?sliceBy%5Bvalue%5D=trace-x | @mkanal  | 
| OPEN| | | | | 
| OPEN| | | | | 

## Open Discussions: 
- [  ] 

## Backlog : 
- [  ] 
- 
*Legend:* 
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-05-23

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
WIP	PR: feature : sorting by status according to the natural order #944	#944	#702	@poojapatel23	Will be reviewed in the next iteration
CLOSED	24.05 TraceX release version and will this version receive security patches after release	what is the relase version of TraceX in 24.05		@rogocof	11.0.1 will be the final release of TraceX in the 24.05 release, but we do not maintain released versions with security patches
OPEN
OPEN

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ]

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-05-02

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
CLOSE	Forwarding of notifications		#713
CLOSE	EDC Version of Release 0.5.3 in R24.3			Currently Trace-X is not planning to upgrade the EDC Version to 0.5.4 in the moment

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ]

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-04-25

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
OPEN	Forwarding of notifications		#713
ClOSE	EDC Version				A result of the Question will be provided EoB 29.04 @ds-lcapellino For the 24.03 we did use the 0.5.3 EDC Version. That's at least the version that is deployed on our INT environment.
CLOSE	Database Info		#893		A result of the Question will be provided EoB 29.04 @ds-lcapellino See here #893
OPEN

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ]

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-04-18

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
CLOSE	Have a look on the current Iteration		https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-tractusx/projects/45/views/5		Had a look to the iteration
CLOSE	Version planned 10.8.4 and further major changes upon that				Recheck that with devs and Release 10.9.0 @ds-lcapellino pusblish this in the matrix chat for external contributors
CLOSE	#847				Changes to database by removing tables or adding tables will be released with a major version to reflect breaking changes - ion additon we will publish this in the changelogs. @ds-lcapellino will add tthe required tasks to the temporary sprint roles (Release Manager)
CLOSE	Notificiation Flow / One up one down priciple

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ]

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-04-11

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
CLOSED	Forwarding of alerts / investigation within Trace-X upwards and downwards		#713	@mkanal	Postphoned to 11.4.2024
CLOSED	Security Topic	see comments of the ticket	#845	@jzbmw	14.04.2024
CLOSED	Development discussions how to	1st adding specific to the Agenda of this round 2nd Use open meeting to have a look on the current sprint		@jzbmw	14.04.2024
OPEN

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ] Version planned 10.8.1 and further major changes upon that.

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-04-04

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
DONE	Features for R24.08	Discuss List of Features for 24.08	https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-tractusx/projects/26/views/23?sliceBy%5Bvalue%5D=trace-x	Presenation of planned features
DONE	Bug		#827	@rogocof	The concept story addresses this #774

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ]

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-03-27

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ] TraceX - The App must be enabled to support multiple connector endpoint for one BPN provided by the discovery sig-release#398
• [ ] TraceX - Print and Download functionality for Alerts and Investigations sig-release#387
• [ ] [CONCEPT] TraceX - it must be possible to define the issue far more granular sig-release#384
• [ ] TraceX - Ensure BPN determination while user enters company name / data sig-release#382
• [ ] https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/sig-release/issue

*Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-03-21

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
DONE	Cofinity-x Tracex team has successfully created first pull request for implementing the natural sorting order of notifications by status and severity.			@poojapatel23	#777 + #779 Integration tests will be added to PR . PR reviews will be assigned to Trace-X Devs providing feedback.
DONE	Is there a Demo Dataset, that can be shared?			@felixschmidtcofinity	Pls take a look here, is this sufficient ? https://github.com/catenax-ng/tx-item-relationship-service/tree/main/local/testing/testdata
DONE	EDC Configuration: There is a "discussion" about this feature mentioned in issues #555 and #557 Can we get context about this? Will this feature stay in future versions?			@rogocof	@jzbmw decision has to be documented in GitHub PO Decision: This component stays in the product.
OPEN	Concept for publish asset feature in Catena-X confluence linked in issue #535 Is it possible to disclose that, or can we find the concept elsewhere?			@rogocof	https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/item-relationship-service/issues/502

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ] TraceX - The App must be enabled to support multiple connector endpoint for one BPN provided by the discovery sig-release#398
• [ ] TraceX - Print and Download functionality for Alerts and Investigations sig-release#387
• [ ] [CONCEPT] TraceX - it must be possible to define the issue far more granular sig-release#384
• [ ] TraceX - Ensure BPN determination while user enters company name / data sig-release#382
• [ ] https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/sig-release/issue

*Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-03-14

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
OPEN	Search functionality	I would like to know if it's possible to implement a search functionality where the search criteria is not limited to just starting with a specific substring but also includes matching strings that contain the specified substring.	#658 (comment)	@poojapatel23	Kindly ask you to create a new feature request for next PI - assign the feature to @jzbmw and @mkanal
OPEN	External contributions assigned in current iteration	https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-tractusx/projects/45/views/5?filterQuery=-status%3Ainbox%2Cbacklog+iteration%3A%40current+label%3Aext_contribution	-	@mkanal
OPEN
OPEN

• [ x ] How to deal with upstream now and in future?
• [ x ] Is it possible to provide integration tests to upstream? > Yes it is we use Cucumber -> Test Strategy will be availablein README in the next few days. If case new test cases should be contributed. Create a Story - align the story within the matrix chat - approval of @jzbmw - afterward create a PR to upstream and inform us regarding this PR.
• [x ] DashboardController Missing PreAuthorize Condition DashboardController has missing @PreAuthorize condition regarding Rights and Role Matrix #726

Open Discussions:

• [ x] Forwarding of alerts / investigation within Trace-X upwards and downwards #713
• [ x] Provide payload for quality notifications #712
• [ x] Title for alerts and investigations #714

Backlog :

• [ ] TraceX - The App must be enabled to support multiple connector endpoint for one BPN provided by the discovery sig-release#398
• [ ] TraceX - Print and Download functionality for Alerts and Investigations sig-release#387
• [ ] [CONCEPT] TraceX - it must be possible to define the issue far more granular sig-release#384
• [ ] TraceX - Ensure BPN determination while user enters company name / data sig-release#382
• [ ] TraceX - alerts / investigations should be possible to trigger from dashboard, the respective menu item as well as from the product detailed view sig-release#381

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-03-07

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
DONE	Jointly Working Model	Frequency of PR (> 1000 lines of code) IP Topic / Feature completeness / working model / First feature contribution / release plan	-	@jzbmw @mkanal	First Cofinity-X contributions are #701 and #702. the working model is challenged and knowledge is acquired and adapted if necessary https://www.eclipse.org/legal/committerguidelines.php#appropriateness
WIP	Provide payload for quality notifications	Alignment on concept, support activities and expected timeline for PR	#712	@mkanal	-
WIP	Title for alerts and investigations		#714	@mkanal	-
WIP	Forwarding of alerts / investigation within trace-X		#713	@mkanal	-
DONE	Update project specific dependencies to latest published stable release.	-	#715	@hsg-ds	-

• [ ] How to deal with upstream now and in future?
• [ ] Is it possible to provide integration tests to upstream? > Yes it is we use Cuc
• [ ] DashboardController Missing PreAuthorize Condition DashboardController has missing @PreAuthorize condition regarding Rights and Role Matrix #726

Open Discussions:

• [ ] Forwarding of alerts / investigation within Trace-X upwards and downwards #713
• [ ] Provide payload for quality notifications #712
• [ ] Title for alerts and investigations #714

Backlog :

• [ ] TraceX - The App must be enabled to support multiple connector endpoint for one BPN provided by the discovery sig-release#398
• [ ] TraceX - Print and Download functionality for Alerts and Investigations sig-release#387
• [ ] [CONCEPT] TraceX - it must be possible to define the issue far more granular sig-release#384
• [ ] TraceX - Ensure BPN determination while user enters company name / data sig-release#382
• [ ] TraceX - alerts / investigations should be possible to trigger from dashboard, the respective menu item as well as from the product detailed view sig-release#381

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

2024-02-29

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
DONE			#700	@hgo-ds	Discussion + Accepted
DONE			#701	@hgo-ds	Discussion + Accepted
DONE			#702	@hgo-ds	Discussion + Accepted
DONE		eclipse-tractusx/sig-release#506	-	-	QG Process explained
DONE		API and Semantic Versioning of API			Trace-X API is released with semantic versioning current C-X Release is https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/traceability-foss/releases/tag/10.3.0

• Update of Compatibility Matrix for C-X Release @ds-lcapellino
• Detailed Release Roadmap for Trace-X requested @jzbmw

2024-02-22

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
DONE	Discussion about Trace-X Business Case		-		Introduction to Trace-X

2024-02-15

Agenda Topics

• Discussing working mode using Matrix Chat, Github as base of discussions //24.02.15
• Status transitions of notifications //24.02.15
• @wiegerterik General understanding of roles and collaboration
  • How does the contribution process look like?
  • Where can we see why or with which motivation things are changing, i.e. how is that submodel working.
• @wiegerterik Feedback on some more or less minor issues which came up during merge activities and how, if making sense, we can provide to upstream
• @wiegerterik Updates of standards - How do we get additional fields added?
• @wiegerterik Wich whom can we align the requirement to ensure that e.g. Partner Network or BPN discovery service can be used.
• @jzbmw: FE Refactoring show more aspects to this

[rogocof]

@jzbmw
Additional agenda topics from Cofinity side:

• Release plan. Is there a schedule for upcoming releases?
• API Versioning: Is there any chance to get any kind of API versions? Already mentioned here (API Versioning #705)

[hgo-ds]

I want to promote the new raised issues #700, as well as #701 and #702.

[hgo-ds]

@mkanal
Since I'm not able to add in the agenda, I'd vote for adding Update project specific dependencies to latest published stable release.

Thanks

[hgo-ds]

@mkanal as #715 is closed, this can be set to DONE in this agenda.

Thanks

[poojapatel23]

@mkanal

Meeting Date: 2024-03-07

Additional agenda topics from the Cofinity side:

Backend

• How to deal with upstream now and in future?
• Is it possible to provide integration tests to upstream?
• DashboardController Missing PreAuthorize Condition DashboardController has missing @PreAuthorize condition regarding Rights and Role Matrix #726

Thank you

[felixschmidtcofinity]

Meeting Date: 2024-03-14

Additional agenda Topics:
-Why does a user have to manually enter the BPN for an alert? This is the case even if there is a parent relationship. For notifications, it is adressed automatically.

[poojapatel23]

[mkanal]

Hey @felixschmidtcofinity
the https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/sldt-semantic-models/blob/main/io.catenax.single_level_bom_as_specified/2.0.0/gen/SingleLevelBomAsSpecified.json does not contain a BPN.
https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/sldt-semantic-models/blob/main/io.catenax.single_level_usage_as_built/2.0.0/gen/SingleLevelUsageAsBuilt.json
In 3.0.0 the businessParter number is included: https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/sldt-semantic-models/blob/main/io.catenax.single_level_usage_as_built/3.0.0/gen/SingleLevelUsageAsBuilt.json
We will shortly switch to this version.
Does this answer your question?

Refer to #603

Best regards
Martin

fyi @jzbmw

[felixschmidtcofinity]

Great news! Thanks Martin thats answers my question.

[mkanal]

@hgo-ds Please refer to https://www.eclipse.org/legal/committerguidelines.php#appropriateness Any contribution greater than 1,000 lines of code is deemed to be "significant". If necessary, the EMO can assist in determining whether a contribution should be classified as "significant".

[poojapatel23]

Meeting Date: 2024-03-14

Additional agenda Topics:

• I would like to know if it's possible to implement a search functionality where the search criteria is not limited to just starting with a specific substring but also includes matching strings that contain the specified substring.

[rogocof]

Meeting Date: 2024-03-14:
Quick question:
What is the version number for 24.03 release for TraceX? 10.6.0?

[mkanal]

Please have a look herer: https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/CHANGELOG

[felixschmidtcofinity]

Topic for our next Meeting:

• Is there a Demo Dataset, that can be shared?

[mkanal]

@felixschmidtcofinity Pls take a look here, is this sufficient ? https://github.com/catenax-ng/tx-item-relationship-service/tree/main/local/testing/testdata

[rogocof]

@mkanal
Topics Meeting Date 2024-03-21:

1. EDC Configuration: There is a "discussion" about this feature mentioned in issues EDC URL Mapping Functionallity #555 and ADR - Manual configurations of EDC urls for BPN in Admin Panel #557 Can we get context about this? Will this feature stay in future versions?
2. Concept for publish asset feature in Catena-X confluence linked in issue Publishing Assets in frontend #535 Is it possible to disclose that or can we find the concept elsewhere?

[mkanal]

@rogocof Decision is documented in tickets.
New issue was created https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/item-relationship-service/issues/502

[poojapatel23]

Meeting Date: 2024-03-21:

Ticket : #701
Pull Request: #777

Ticket: #702
Pull Request: #779

1. Would it be possible to include a test case concerning the new sorting feature within the same pull request (PR)?
2. Could you please provide feedback or suggestions that need to be addressed for the pull request (PR)?

[rogocof]

Meeting Date: 04.04.2024
I created an issue (probably a bug) #827

[hgo-ds]

@mkanal
I'd like to discuss this issue today: #845 -- SubmodelController is unprotected.

[poojapatel23]

Meeting Date: 18.04.2024

@jzbmw
We would like to discuss this topic next week regarding database migration flyway script #847

[rogocof]

Meeting Date April 24:
Catena-X Release 24.0524.03: According to the Compatibility Matrix https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/traceability-foss/blob/main/COMPATIBILITY_MATRIX.md Trace-X is only compatible to EDC 0.5.3. However the EDC 0.5.4 is already part of 24.0524.03 release (https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/tractus-x-release/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md). Can you clarify this version mismatch? @jzbmw @mkanal

[jzbmw]

For the 24.05 Release, the EDC Version 0.7.x is planned and committed

[rogocof]

Sorry I meant 24.03

[rogocof]

24.03 Trace-X Compatibility Matrix:

traceability-foss/COMPATIBILITY_MATRIX.md

Line 176 in d731828

| EDC | tractusx-connector | 0.5.3 | 2.0.0 | Connector for Data Transfer and Registration |

VS.

24.03 EDC release version

https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/tractus-x-release/blob/df39b9d370db86d65fdc6b9bcfd333d6d64bb2cb/CHANGELOG.md?plain=1#L39

[ds-lcapellino]

For the 24.03 we did use the 0.5.3 EDC Version. That's at least the version that is deployed on our INT environment.

[poojapatel23]

Meeting Date: 25th April 2024

@jzbmw we would like to know some basic information regarding some database columns: #893

[ds-lcapellino]

2024-05-23

Agenda Topics

Status	Topic	Description	IssueId / Links	Contributed by	Outcome
WIP	PR: feature : sorting by status according to the natural order #944	#944	#702	@poojapatel23	Will be reviewed in the next iteration
CLOSED	24.05 TraceX release version and will this version receive security patches after release	what is the relase version of TraceX in 24.05		@rogocof	11.0.1 will be the final release of TraceX in the 24.05 release, but we do not maintain released versions with security patches
OPEN
OPEN

Open Discussions:

• [ ]

Backlog :

• [ ]

Legend:
Status: OPEN, WIP, DONE

[poojapatel23]

Meeting Date: 2024-06-13:

Topic 1 : Is there any reason to make the BPN/receiverBpn field required to create notification in 11.0.0 release?

Topic 2 : I would like to ask you about the integration test cases for release 11.0.2. We are facing an issue where some integration tests fail when we run the mvn clean install command. However, these tests pass when run individually.

Could you please confirm if you are experiencing the same issue with the 11.0.2 release?

[rogocof]

Hi @mkanal,
Meeting Jun 27:
Question regarding the IRS. There was an important bugfix provided for 24.05. eclipse-tractusx/item-relationship-service@cfc065c
Is it possible to backport/cherry pick such a fix to a version compatible to 24.03? Is there process to provide fixes to older versions and to create a new version tag? In our case we would need the fix for 4.5.X

Summary of the issue: Submodel requests are not AAS compatible without the /$value suffix

[rogocof]

Hi @mkanal,
Meeting July 11th:

1. IRS uses Spring Web 6.0.X. When executing a GET request, we send a "content-length" header with value "0". This is according to RFC 7230 only "Acceptable" and will be blocked by some servers/proxies/load balancers. GET requests should not contain this header at all. The issues is fixed with Spring Web 6.1.X. Is there any update of Spring/Spring Web planned? Currently it is hard to operate the IRS with that issue. (See also "GET must not have a request body" exception with OkhttpClient and BufferingClientHttpRequestFactory spring-projects/spring-framework#32612)
2. IRS BPDM request: Can you give context why BPDM lookup was removed? eclipse-tractusx/item-relationship-service@74495fe
   Currently we ran into an error here as well for 24.03 and want to clarify if we can solve that.