You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the Logstash API outputs or at least for its Elasticsearch output would you kindly consider forcing its HTTP user agent to report as Logstash? "Manticore" still creeps through sometimes-almost-randomly which most team mates don't know how to interpret.
Example from Elastic Cloud proxy logging showing even recent versions affected by user_agent: Manticore *
Vs expected user agent formats Logstash/* like
TIA! 🙏
(Self-note: data uncertainty would be further exposed once es#112845 done, but concern would be reduced by ls#16448 if implemented instead.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@stefnestor That is surprising, as we have set the user-agent to Logstash/xxxx in all of our Elasticsearch plugins for a while now - we have shipped versions of the elasticsearch input, filter and output that populated the user-agent with Logstash/<VERSION> since 7.16.0. They used manticore-0.7.1, so I am surprised to see versions of manticore higher than that in your proxy logs.
What does the handling_version in the first table refer to?
Is there a way to understand which endpoints are being hit, so we can isolate where we believe the issue is? I would be particularly interested in seeing the proxy logs when the user-agent is Manticore > 0.7.1
👋 howdy, team!
For the Logstash API outputs or at least for its Elasticsearch output would you kindly consider forcing its HTTP user agent to report as Logstash? "Manticore" still creeps through sometimes-almost-randomly which most team mates don't know how to interpret.
Example from Elastic Cloud proxy logging showing even recent versions affected by
user_agent: Manticore *
Vs expected user agent formats
Logstash/*
likeTIA! 🙏
(Self-note: data uncertainty would be further exposed once es#112845 done, but concern would be reduced by ls#16448 if implemented instead.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: