Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[apm] Clarify how to create/use API keys #4670

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

colleenmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes inconsistencies in how we talk about API keys for APM Server usage.

Documentation sets edited in this PR

Check all that apply.

  • Stateful (docs/en/observability/*)
  • Serverless (docs/en/serverless/*)
  • Integrations Developer Guide (docs/en/integrations/*)
  • None of the above

Related issue

Closes #4312

Checklist

  • Product/Engineering Review
  • Writer Review

Follow-up tasks

Select one.

  • This PR does not need to be ported to another doc set because:
    • The concepts in this PR only apply to one doc set (serverless or stateful)
    • The PR contains edits to both doc sets (serverless and stateful)
  • This PR needs to be ported to another doc set:
    • Port to stateful docs: <link to PR or tracking issue>
    • Port to serverless docs: <link to PR or tracking issue>

@colleenmcginnis colleenmcginnis added backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify backport-8.16 Automated backport with mergify backport-8.17 Automated backport with mergify labels Dec 11, 2024
@colleenmcginnis colleenmcginnis self-assigned this Dec 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

@colleenmcginnis colleenmcginnis marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2024 21:08
@colleenmcginnis colleenmcginnis requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2024 21:08
eedugon
eedugon previously approved these changes Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@eedugon eedugon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just found a couple of issues, shared as comments.
Looks great!

@eedugon

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Co-authored-by: Edu González de la Herrán <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify backport-8.16 Automated backport with mergify backport-8.17 Automated backport with mergify needs-dev-review needs-writer-review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Request]: inconsistencies in API Key description for APM Server usage
3 participants