Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XML Parse error in EntityDescriptor - ADFS metadata file #6

Open
socdream opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

XML Parse error in EntityDescriptor - ADFS metadata file #6

socdream opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@socdream
Copy link

socdream commented Nov 5, 2015

I'm getting an error while trying to add an identity provider based on an ADFS metadata file, the error is:

{"The specified type was not recognized: name='ApplicationServiceType',
namespace='http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsfed/federation/200706',
at ."}

It comes from the Deserialize method in the Serialization class

@svrooij
Copy link
Contributor

svrooij commented Dec 17, 2015

@socdream why would you use this library to try to login with ADFS. This library is for Identity Providers that use SAML2. For ADFS you should check out this package.

@eByte23
Copy link

eByte23 commented Feb 4, 2016

@svrooij why would you not try and use this library, SAML is a universal spec, you can use ADFS as a SAML IDPthis allows you to use and SP app that allows SAML otherwise people would have to implement different types of auth for many IDP types.

I also encountered this issue and I will need to fix it for my implementation.

@zarusz
Copy link
Contributor

zarusz commented Dec 19, 2016

@socdream and @eByte23 did you integrate successfully with ADFS and this library (over SAML2.0 protocol)?

What I can tell the library worked well with PingFederate as identity provider, now wondering about ADFS.
My use case requires to use SAML2 protocol and ADFS is one of the target IdP.

@eByte23
Copy link

eByte23 commented Dec 19, 2016 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants