Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TS-4100: Reduce FRAM SPI bus max speed (affects linux-4.9.y and linux-5.10.y) #76

Closed
ts-kris opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@ts-kris
Copy link
Contributor

ts-kris commented Apr 10, 2024

While the FRAM part itself is rated for 20 MHz, this seems to be too high for the path from the TS-4100 through to the baseboard and some operations may end up with incorrect data written to the FRAM itself. Reducing the speed to 15 MHz or lower has been tested to be stable along the operating range. Heavily de-rate to 1-2 MHz as it is a 2 kbyte part and that is plenty of speed for the size.

Note that this needs to be adjusted in both the linux-5.10.y branch and the linux-4.9.y branch and mirrored to the standalone linux-4.9.y repo: https://github.com/embeddedTS/linux-4.9.y/

@ts-kris ts-kris self-assigned this Apr 10, 2024
@ts-kris
Copy link
Contributor Author

ts-kris commented May 17, 2024

Fixed by #86

@ts-kris ts-kris closed this as completed May 17, 2024
markfeathers pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2024
…hunk()

commit 10d9d8c3512f16cad47b2ff81ec6fc4b27d8ee10 upstream.

[BUG]
There is an internal report that KASAN is reporting use-after-free, with
the following backtrace:

  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in btrfs_check_read_bio+0xa68/0xb70 [btrfs]
  Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881117cec28 by task kworker/u16:2/45
  CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 45 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc2-next-20240805-default+ #76
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
  Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_end_bio_work [btrfs]
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack_lvl+0x61/0x80
   print_address_description.constprop.0+0x5e/0x2f0
   print_report+0x118/0x216
   kasan_report+0x11d/0x1f0
   btrfs_check_read_bio+0xa68/0xb70 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0xce0/0x12a0
   worker_thread+0x717/0x1250
   kthread+0x2e3/0x3c0
   ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
   ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20

  Allocated by task 20917:
   kasan_save_stack+0x37/0x60
   kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30
   __kasan_slab_alloc+0x7d/0x80
   kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x16e/0x3e0
   mempool_alloc_noprof+0x12e/0x310
   bio_alloc_bioset+0x3f0/0x7a0
   btrfs_bio_alloc+0x2e/0x50 [btrfs]
   submit_extent_page+0x4d1/0xdb0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_do_readpage+0x8b4/0x12a0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_readahead+0x29a/0x430 [btrfs]
   read_pages+0x1a7/0xc60
   page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x2ad/0x560
   filemap_get_pages+0x629/0xa20
   filemap_read+0x335/0xbf0
   vfs_read+0x790/0xcb0
   ksys_read+0xfd/0x1d0
   do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

  Freed by task 20917:
   kasan_save_stack+0x37/0x60
   kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30
   kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x50
   __kasan_slab_free+0x4b/0x60
   kmem_cache_free+0x214/0x5d0
   bio_free+0xed/0x180
   end_bbio_data_read+0x1cc/0x580 [btrfs]
   btrfs_submit_chunk+0x98d/0x1880 [btrfs]
   btrfs_submit_bio+0x33/0x70 [btrfs]
   submit_one_bio+0xd4/0x130 [btrfs]
   submit_extent_page+0x3ea/0xdb0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_do_readpage+0x8b4/0x12a0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_readahead+0x29a/0x430 [btrfs]
   read_pages+0x1a7/0xc60
   page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x2ad/0x560
   filemap_get_pages+0x629/0xa20
   filemap_read+0x335/0xbf0
   vfs_read+0x790/0xcb0
   ksys_read+0xfd/0x1d0
   do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

[CAUSE]
Although I cannot reproduce the error, the report itself is good enough
to pin down the cause.

The call trace is the regular endio workqueue context, but the
free-by-task trace is showing that during btrfs_submit_chunk() we
already hit a critical error, and is calling btrfs_bio_end_io() to error
out.  And the original endio function called bio_put() to free the whole
bio.

This means a double freeing thus causing use-after-free, e.g.:

1. Enter btrfs_submit_bio() with a read bio
   The read bio length is 128K, crossing two 64K stripes.

2. The first run of btrfs_submit_chunk()

2.1 Call btrfs_map_block(), which returns 64K
2.2 Call btrfs_split_bio()
    Now there are two bios, one referring to the first 64K, the other
    referring to the second 64K.
2.3 The first half is submitted.

3. The second run of btrfs_submit_chunk()

3.1 Call btrfs_map_block(), which by somehow failed
    Now we call btrfs_bio_end_io() to handle the error

3.2 btrfs_bio_end_io() calls the original endio function
    Which is end_bbio_data_read(), and it calls bio_put() for the
    original bio.

    Now the original bio is freed.

4. The submitted first 64K bio finished
   Now we call into btrfs_check_read_bio() and tries to advance the bio
   iter.
   But since the original bio (thus its iter) is already freed, we
   trigger the above use-after free.

   And even if the memory is not poisoned/corrupted, we will later call
   the original endio function, causing a double freeing.

[FIX]
Instead of calling btrfs_bio_end_io(), call btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io(),
which has the extra check on split bios and do the proper refcounting
for cloned bios.

Furthermore there is already one extra btrfs_cleanup_bio() call, but
that is duplicated to btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io() call, so remove that
label completely.

Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Fixes: 852eee6 ("btrfs: allow btrfs_submit_bio to split bios")
CC: [email protected] # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant