You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks a lot all - I've tested it out and it's working well now! I've included the updated figure below on the same data for reference, in case helpful!
@jamesmbaazam regarding extra documentation, I think that at some point it could be useful to add a short, dedicated section on applying to weekly data. The current documentation mentions the rw estimator for weekly, but I think having a section with an example as you do for daily could be beneficial to others as we work a lot with weekly aggregated data. The other thing would probably be then to be able to visualize on weekly scale too, but as it's possible for end users to extract the estimates and create visuals I don't think it's really necessary.
Thanks again for your help and for a great package!
Agree. Perhaps edit the title and add a plan/outline?
jamesmbaazam
changed the title
Surface feature for working with temporally aggregated data (i.e., obs_opts(na = "accumulate") )
Add vignette on modelling temporally aggregated data (i.e., obs_opts(na = "accumulate") )
Sep 16, 2024
Thanks a lot all - I've tested it out and it's working well now! I've included the updated figure below on the same data for reference, in case helpful!
@jamesmbaazam regarding extra documentation, I think that at some point it could be useful to add a short, dedicated section on applying to weekly data. The current documentation mentions the rw estimator for weekly, but I think having a section with an example as you do for daily could be beneficial to others as we work a lot with weekly aggregated data. The other thing would probably be then to be able to visualize on weekly scale too, but as it's possible for end users to extract the estimates and create visuals I don't think it's really necessary.
Thanks again for your help and for a great package!
Originally posted by @martinamcm in #767 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: