You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our list of permitted metres does not include the sa-vipulā variant of the anuṣṭubh. As far as I know, this vipulā is not recognised by any authority on chandas, but it occurs in some texts frequently enough that at least some modern theoreticians believe it to have been a legitimate variant at least in some circles. I have now run into such a line in one of my texts, where a metrical error is more likely (the same stanza has a grossly unmetrical quarter too), but I see that met="sa-vipulā" has been used in at least one DHARMA file, DHARMA_INSCIK00667.xml, and we may want to legitimise that.
Should I add the sa-vipulā to the list of prosodic patterns?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Our list of permitted metres does not include the sa-vipulā variant of the anuṣṭubh. As far as I know, this vipulā is not recognised by any authority on chandas, but it occurs in some texts frequently enough that at least some modern theoreticians believe it to have been a legitimate variant at least in some circles. I have now run into such a line in one of my texts, where a metrical error is more likely (the same stanza has a grossly unmetrical quarter too), but I see that
met="sa-vipulā"
has been used in at least one DHARMA file, DHARMA_INSCIK00667.xml, and we may want to legitimise that.Should I add the sa-vipulā to the list of prosodic patterns?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: