-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Parallel computation precision #304
Labels
Explore
Examine novel functionality/proposed changes etc. Does not necessarily involve coding things.
Performance
Improve the number crunching
Comments
tensionhead
added
the
Bug
An error that is serious but does not break (parts of) the package. However, it clearly impedes the
label
Jul 11, 2022
tensionhead
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2022
- testing single and chained call plus selections - roadblock atm: #304
tensionhead
added
Minor Bug
A flaw in the code or documentation that is clearly an error but does neither impede package functio
and removed
Bug
An error that is serious but does not break (parts of) the package. However, it clearly impedes the
labels
Jul 11, 2022
So as for these connectivity measures the values are all between |
dfsp-spirit
changed the title
Paralell computation precision
Parallel computation precision
Aug 25, 2022
Turns out, for Granger causality that can have effects of up to |
tensionhead
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2022
tensionhead
added
the
Explore
Examine novel functionality/proposed changes etc. Does not necessarily involve coding things.
label
Dec 14, 2022
tensionhead
added
Performance
Improve the number crunching
and removed
Minor Bug
A flaw in the code or documentation that is clearly an error but does neither impede package functio
labels
Jan 2, 2023
tensionhead
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 3, 2023
- parallel precision issue again, see #304
tensionhead
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 3, 2023
- parallel precision issue again, see #304
tensionhead
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 5, 2023
- we really need to look into this parallel precision issues #304
tensionhead
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 5, 2023
- we really need to look into this parallel precision issues #304
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Explore
Examine novel functionality/proposed changes etc. Does not necessarily involve coding things.
Performance
Improve the number crunching
At least for the coherence, sequential and parallel computing do not give the same results:
This will give
True
fortest_seq
butFalse
fortest_parallel
! No idea where to start to look even, coherences can have tricky denominators (if power at that freq. is almost 0), but no clue if that's the problem here.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: