Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feedback from aiida-firecrest #61

Open
chrisjsewell opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Feedback from aiida-firecrest #61

chrisjsewell opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Contributor

Heya @ekouts just before I forget, as we just discussed, https://github.com/aiidateam/aiida-firecrest is now provisionally working with the latest version of pyfirecrest thanks 🎉

Feel free to have a look and provide any feedback.
A few notes (that I may add to later):

  1. I am using an improved version of ✨ Add pathlib.Path interface #43 here: https://github.com/aiidateam/aiida-firecrest/blob/main/aiida_firecrest/remote_path.py, maybe this can eventually be upstreamed to here
  2. I'm running the tests against a live instance of the firecrest demo server in Github CI: https://github.com/aiidateam/aiida-firecrest/blob/eb7f7518857794a99bae3568c74f0981b695dd79/.github/workflows/server-tests.yml
  3. /utilities/upload can modify the requested filename (Very problematic 😅) firecrest#191 is currently the major block for production
  4. The next major improvement is to look into improving large file transfers: Optimize file transfer aiidateam/aiida-firecrest#23
@ekouts
Copy link
Collaborator

ekouts commented Jul 11, 2023

Thanks a lot @chrisjsewell , your feedback is always useful!

(1) and (3): For the next weeks, we will prioritize eth-cscs/firecrest#191 and #43 .
(2) And running the tests against the demo server would be much easier than what I am currently doing so I will have a look.
(4) These are changes in the AiiDa side, correct?

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Contributor Author

These are changes in the AiiDa side, correct?

yep indeed, although there may eventually be something to upstream

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants