Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.

Segmentation Performance #2

Open
cyrilzakka opened this issue Apr 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Segmentation Performance #2

cyrilzakka opened this issue Apr 23, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@cyrilzakka
Copy link

I greatly enjoyed reading your paper but I'm curious about the segmentation performance of such models. Do MSNs share the same segmentation properties as DINO?

@MidoAssran
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @cyrilzakka ,

Great question! We didn't check segmentation properties, but just released the pre-trained models so you're welcome to check!

My thoughts:
In general, MSN introduces an additional mask invariance, which helps the model discard a lot of instance-level information and produce more abstract representations. This property is helpful for low-shot semantic abstraction tasks, but I imagine could hurt performance on low-level tasks like segmentation. In short, I would expect performance to be similar to DINO on segmentation, although I would be a little surprised if it was better by any significant margin. Having said this, I have not personally checked and would be curious to learn about your findings if you try this.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants