Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
This is a good question @paulz - I think you should be able to get the same behavior using recordExceptionModel: I'd imaging you're using recordError: right now. Under the hood this calls To replicate this behavior using
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Also seeing that So not sure if we are going to get same error report and what should we write as firebase-ios-sdk/Crashlytics/Crashlytics/Components/FIRCLSUserLogging.m Lines 354 to 366 in 1ef1ea2 vs firebase-ios-sdk/Crashlytics/Crashlytics/Handlers/FIRCLSException.mm Lines 174 to 189 in 1ef1ea2 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Looks like exception model does not support additional info like error:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We are currently reporting handled exception using our custom error handler, which forwards errors to Crashlytics.
Unfortunately this cause our error handler to be reported as a root cause of all errors.
Would it be possible to customize error reporter to exclude our error handler from stack traces?
Or mark it grayed out as
FIRCLSUserLogging.m - Line 393
andFIRCLSUserLoggingRecordError + 393
Similar how Bugsnag allows removing modifying stack traces:
https://docs.bugsnag.com/platforms/ios/customizing-error-reports/#modifying-stack-traces
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions