Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for root strings #6

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 21, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

add support for root strings #6

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 21, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

I've been told that when licensed, some fonts include requirements that
root strings have to be set.

I should add support for root strings so that ttf2eot users can abide by
these terms.

(Note that root strings provide no security, and are trivially
removed/modified/etc)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by taviso on 3 Jun 2009 at 9:09

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Root string support is useful, but for some projects using opensource fonts, it 
is
also useful to be able to not have a root string.

Original comment by [email protected] on 17 Jul 2009 at 4:57

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Without a root string, the eot file will not render in IE.  See Issue # 10

Original comment by [email protected] on 23 Jul 2009 at 4:56

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

At the risk of merely posting a "me too", I was wondering if any progress has 
been made on this? Would there be 
any benefit to having access to some commercial fonts that are failing to 
convert, for testing purposes? I have 
some fonts that aren't converting successfully (specifically, don't render in 
IE) and which I have semi-urgent 
need to be able to convert. (Yes, I could use FontSquirrel, or EOTFast, or 
whatnot, but I need to be able to do this 
on-demand, rather than via a manual process.) I think I can wrangle permission 
to send one or two of these 
fonts to someone who's working this bug.

Original comment by rbowen%[email protected] on 26 Feb 2010 at 3:28

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant