Replies: 5 comments 4 replies
-
Logo looks awesome thanks Bianca 🥇 I would use this logo for the GitOps Toolkit only until we release Flux v2, after that we could replace Flux logo with this one. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is the plan that we use this logo for everything GitOps Toolkit for now and once the "v2" milestones of Flux and Helm Operator have been reached we reconsider what we use for those? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It's the Flux project. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I like this as a techo-pictogram, because it conveys the right meanings and isn't fussy. It comes across to me more like a node in a diagram and less like a logo, and I think I get that impression because the individual elements have been in lots of diagrams I've seen lately -- or, interpreting a little, it doesn't stick out to me as identifying a specific thing, rather than a general process or entity. I know these are to some extent opposed, but -- is there a way to keep the elegance of it as a pictogram, and pick out a detail that makes it particular. (People mentioned that the loops looked like "G" and "O" -- not sure if that helps or hinders ..) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
May I use the icon for a presentation? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Today in the FluxCD meeting, I introduced the following as a potential GitOps toolkit icon / logo.
This brought up some questions around the identity of our set of tools, considering that 'fluxcd' is the name of the parent project.
There is already a flux logo. Should we keep it and add the other as a GitOps logo. Should everything live under a Flux logo? Should everything live under a GitOps logo? Discuss.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions