From 16fe0c95ae757b1fc9c0fe600bcba93639e27bf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: stephen <138625055+stephendotgg@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:53:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] minor improvements
---
Writerside/flyte.tree | 15 ++++++---------
Writerside/topics/File-Extensions.topic | 2 +-
Writerside/topics/Getting-Started.topic | 3 ++-
Writerside/topics/SQL.md | 2 +-
Writerside/topics/Scheduler.topic | 8 +++-----
Writerside/topics/Ternary-Operator.topic | 10 +++++-----
6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Writerside/flyte.tree b/Writerside/flyte.tree
index 88d2d1d..c9a2726 100644
--- a/Writerside/flyte.tree
+++ b/Writerside/flyte.tree
@@ -46,25 +46,22 @@
- This is particularly useful when used in parallel with our other open-source library, resource-pack-deploy, + This is particularly useful when used in parallel with our other open-source library, resource-pack-deploy, so you can get the hash of the latest resource pack file, and use it to reset a client's cached version of your resource pack if there are any differences.
diff --git a/Writerside/topics/Getting-Started.topic b/Writerside/topics/Getting-Started.topic index 7e8e543..34a12f0 100644 --- a/Writerside/topics/Getting-Started.topic +++ b/Writerside/topics/Getting-Started.topic @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@Add the Flyte repository and Twilight dependency to your build tool of choice.
Twilight's repeat conflicting with Kotlin's repeat? As an alternative, you can use repeatingTask.
-Bukkit's built-in scheduler is tedious at best, so Twilight takes advantage of beautiful Kotlin syntax to make it easier to write, as well as adding a custom TimeUnit to save you calculating ticks. @@ -87,5 +83,7 @@ }
Twilight's repeat conflicting with Kotlin's repeat? As an alternative, you can use repeatingTask.
+This doesn't yet work for evaluating functions either side of the ternary though, we plan to figure this - out in the near future.
-There is a basic ternary operator implementation added which can be used like so:
This doesn't yet work for evaluating functions either side of the ternary though, we plan to figure this + out in the near future.
+