You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When building a store from a directory tree in uncompressed mode, it would be great if desync could also use reflink, as that would reduce the size of the store on disk dramatically.
Use case is: updating filesystems using images and re-using the chunks of the files which are already there.
Do you mean reflinking of parts of chunks within the chunk store?
Chunk-stores dedup already de-dup whole chunks by their hash basically. There's currently no other/smaller hash that is performed on parts of chunks that could be used for reflinks. Also, given the way chunks are created based on split points in the content, I suspect it's very unlikely to align to block boundaries (typically 4k) which is necessary for reflinks. The only parts of chunks that could be reflinked would be blank/0-byte sections within chunks but the tool would still need to know where and how large those are.
When building a store from a directory tree in uncompressed mode, it would be great if desync could also use reflink, as that would reduce the size of the store on disk dramatically.
Use case is: updating filesystems using images and re-using the chunks of the files which are already there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: