Improve reference linking in glossary, or remove promise to do so.

[LukasWallrich]

Currently, the glossary has an intense note promising better links for references. I have already slightly toned that down in my translation PR - but is someone actually working on this? If not, is it important? Or should we just remove it and link to the reference list? @flavioazevedo

If someone wants to do it, the best might be to just include full references, with a DOI link - for that, we would need to parse the reference list into bibtex (probably a simple ChatGPT call) and then actually add the reference to each glossary entry. Not very difficult, but takes a few hours and then some validation work.

[github-actions]

This issue has been inactive for more than 90 days. If there is no further activity, it will be automatically closed in seven days time. You can reopen the issue if it is still relevant.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically closed due to it being stale for more than 7 days. Please feel free to reopen if you still want this issue.

[github-actions]

This issue has been inactive for more than 90 days. If there is no further activity, it will be automatically closed in seven days time. You can reopen the issue if it is still relevant.

[LukasWallrich]

keep open

[github-actions]

This issue has been inactive for more than 90 days. If there is no further activity, it will be automatically closed in seven days time. You can reopen the issue if it is still relevant.

[LukasWallrich]

Open

…

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025, 09:25 github-actions[bot], ***@***.***> wrote: This issue has been inactive for more than 90 days. If there is no further activity, it will be automatically closed in seven days time. You can reopen the issue if it is still relevant. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#135 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOK6NGOVJ5R6WIEHPSZLPNT2J4VTPAVCNFSM6AAAAABKLX2THWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKOBRGYYTINBXHE> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>