RECAP Email: Confirm if additional data needs to be replicated to subdockets

[albertisfu]

In #4665 I suggested that we'd need to apply a similar approach for RECAPEmail data.

However, this issue might already be resolved. Currently, we parse the "multi-NEF" format, which includes docket entries associated with multiple cases. During this process, we parse the entry, document, and attachments (if available) and replicate them across all related cases.

I'd like to confirm whether multi-nefs are the same as dopeldockets. If so, the work for RECAP emails might already be complete. Below are some examples of multi-NEFs for reference:

https://github.com/freelawproject/juriscraper/blob/main/tests/examples/pacer/nef/s3/jpml_1.json
https://github.com/freelawproject/juriscraper/blob/main/tests/examples/pacer/nef/s3/nysd_3.json

Additionally, is it guaranteed that a RECAP email will always include all its subdockets, or is it possible for only some of them to be listed? If the latter is true, we would still need to identify and process any subdockets that might not be included in the email content.

[mlissner]

is it possible for only some of them to be listed?

I admit I don't know, unfortunately, but sounds like we can let this be for a bit after fixing the other issues and see if it's still an issue.