You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We've just added TOML and made it the default in the match, however I feel like we should consider dropping YAML entirely. Atleast for the time being.
Randomizer mods, for example, might want to parse the mod profile to offer additional support for other mods.
I feel like in the end we want to move this use-case to a dedicated API somehow, but on the short term it means they will have to add YAML support to their parsing procedure etc,
I also personally feel that supporting both formats will result in noise on the troubleshooting as well.
To top it all off, adding it back should be a backwards compatible change. (Later down the line when we have better facilities for mod detection).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After a quick talk we've decided to immediately head for the correct solution which comes down to us parsing the config and offering a stable API for mod discovery.
Note: the real problem we're trying to solve here is allowing downstream "Launcher" programs to generate a mod profile. TOML support is not very widespread in other ecosystems (notably .NET), and something like YAML or JSON is easier to interop with.
We've just added TOML and made it the default in the match, however I feel like we should consider dropping YAML entirely. Atleast for the time being.
Randomizer mods, for example, might want to parse the mod profile to offer additional support for other mods.
I feel like in the end we want to move this use-case to a dedicated API somehow, but on the short term it means they will have to add YAML support to their parsing procedure etc,
I also personally feel that supporting both formats will result in noise on the troubleshooting as well.
To top it all off, adding it back should be a backwards compatible change. (Later down the line when we have better facilities for mod detection).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: