Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using KiCAD repository symbols/footprints #7

Open
ki5libs opened this issue Sep 13, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Using KiCAD repository symbols/footprints #7

ki5libs opened this issue Sep 13, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@ki5libs
Copy link

ki5libs commented Sep 13, 2019

Hello @daveshah1

Nice board! But why do you use local libraries? Some symbols (ex. 93AA46B_OT in eco_memory) exist in upstream KiCAD repository (93AAxxB in Memory_EEPROM). What do you think about my help for creating KiCAD repository PRs for the rest of the symbols (and may be footprints) with some reworkings in reasonable cases? It would be a good idea to use symbols from the repository in rev.1.1, woudn't it?

Best regards,
Anton Lysak

@daveshah1
Copy link
Collaborator

In most cases, local libraries were used when I couldn't find a suitable symbol in the included ones, in some cases this might have been historical and an equivalent symbol is now upstream. I would certainly welcome your help in upstreaming symbols and move towards using upstreamed symbols wherever possible.

The ECP5 symbol came from a generator (https://github.com/xesscorp/KiPart/), I'm not sure how that would work in terms of upstreaming - given the large number of pins, one would want to avoid significant manual fixes.

@ki5libs
Copy link
Author

ki5libs commented Sep 13, 2019

Perfect! Do you have any BOM for producing this board, which could be used as a datasheet source? Just because any symbol in the KiCAD repository should have the datasheet link.

@daveshah1
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, https://github.com/daveshah1/TrellisBoard/blob/master/hardware/ecp5_mainboard/mainboard_prod/ecp5_mainboard_bom_elecrow.xls (generating more of the BOM automatically might be something to look at in the future)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants